ZASTO " svet " ne napravi debatu vodecih zagovornika ovoga ili onoga ? Lepo se suoce , iznesu zapazanja , dokaze do kojih su dosli . Verujem da bi posle toga narod bolje razumeo sta je i kako je . Ne mislim samo na ovu temu jer danas za svaku sitnicu postoji ovo ili ono ! Sludjuju nas maksimalno 
.
Sad vec BataStevo "Money talks" i istina je suvise zamagljena da bi se saznala i videla... Lova i samo lova... Da nije toga, kako bi rasli dzidipiji i ostalo ne samo kod nas... i drugi mazu samo tako...
Prema predvidjanjima iz devedestih koja su bila jako ekstremna a odnosila su se bas na ovaj period, nivo okeana vec sad je trebalo preko metra da bude visi itd... Mislim da bi pola Vojvodine vec davno brckalo noge i islo na plazu
Naravno da se klima menja, oduvek je tako, imali smo i mini ledena doba, i mini "sahare" itd. Uvek se vratim na ono "zasto bas ime Greenland?" Verovatno se bela prelivala na zeleno
Secam se kad je ceo taj hype poceo davne 1987,
https://www.apnews.com/664cf2e917604adf90472daa35989ffbkada je James Hansen svedocio u Kongresu o globalnim promenama klime i izneo neka predvidjanja... Posle je to postao hype i moda, kapital je nanjusio potencijal i eto...
In his 1988 study, Hansen and colleagues used three different scenarios for emissions of heat-trapping gases — high, low and medium. Hansen and other scientists concentrated on the middle scenario.
Hansen projected that by 2017, the globe’s five-year average temperature would be about 1.85 degrees (1.03 degree Celsius) higher than the 1950 to 1980 NASA-calculated average. NASA’s five-year average global temperature ending in 2017 was 1.48 degrees above the 30-year average. (He did not take into account that the sun would be cooling a tad, which would reduce warming nearly two-tenths of a degree Fahrenheit, said the Scripps Institution of Oceanography’s Jeff Severinghaus.)
Hansen also predicted a certain number of days of extreme weather — temperature above 95 degrees, freezing days, and nights when the temperatures that don’t drop below 75 — per year for four U.S. cities in the decade of the 2010s.
Hansen’s forecast generally underestimated this decade’s warming in Washington, overestimated it in Omaha, was about right in New York and mixed in Memphis.
Po meni odlican clanak u WSJ:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/thirty-years-on-how-well-do-global-warming-predictions-stand-up-1529623442 ali treba ili pretplata ili sub pa se moze procitati na ovom linku ispod:
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2018/06/22/thirty-years-on-how-well-do-global-warming-predictions-stand-up/It turns out that global surface temperature has not increased significantly since 2000, discounting the larger-than-usual El Niño of 2015-16.
And it isn’t just Hansen who got it wrong, models devised by the IPCC have, on average, predicted about twice as much warming as has been observed since global satellite temperature monitoring began 40 years ago.
Secam se dobro tih tabela, mislim da je Zabavnik sve to bio preneo ali i NIN, Start, Mladina itd...
Pa eto, ko hoce da se zanima...
edit:
A da smo mi ljudi jedni obicni gubari i to stoji...
Pogledaj borsku reku, nekad su se ljudi kupali tamo... pa pogledaj sta je ovo
https://twitter.com/savski_nasip/status/1090993205728948224 Pa gde je voda?
Skakavci, gubari, unistivaci... ma nemam reci. Pocecu masno da psujem
(Stenjevac)
Vise su zlata mogli ovde da isperu nego sto su terali ovu mhe za*ebanciju
